A 10% sample of each underwriter's cases in the UK and Holland was auditted by an underwriter (Noah) comparing paper records with prints from the system and then confirming findings with the underwriter concerned (01067). This was an extensive exercise taking up to a day for each case (00947) and even experienced IT literate underwriters like Noah had some errors (00676). The US was not auditted because there were too many data and other problems in America (01015, 00719).
Social influence: |
|
Technical influence: |
Process: Quality procedures |
![]() |
Commentary |
![]() |
Social influence |
||
![]() |
Technical influence |
![]() |
© Clare Tagg 2000