INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | BOTTOM

Why was the quality of the data poor?: Responsibility for data quality

The audit was thorough, with a comprehensive set of findings and recommendations (01016, 00781, 00782), but these were treated very confidentially (00081, 00753, 00737) and in the UK the results were not acted upon with any degree of urgency (00837).

Social influence:
Technical influence:
Process: Quality procedures

Commentary
Social influence
Technical influence

INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | TOP

© Clare Tagg 2000