INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | BOTTOM

Why was the quality of the data poor?: Responsibility for data quality

Within X, the Post Implementation Review is seen as so explosive that George, the director responsible for IT, did not keep it to himself (00920) but shared it with Robert who was responsible for Multinational. Strange to think that Robert wouldn't have had a copy in his own right. The data audit which was potentially far more explosive seems to have been kept under much tighter wraps (00753) so that Gordan didn't see it (00737) and the report on Holland wasn't immediately available even to the rest of the audit team (00837).

Social influence:
Organisation: Culture
Technical influence:

Commentary
Social influence
Technical influence

INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | TOP

© Clare Tagg 2000