' ... basically what it comes down to is, we have me and Nigel sort of saying we're definitely going to keep it this way. There was a document around saying do it this way and because essentially we're the two senior developers on it at the time and if people did it other ways we moaned at them until they did right and that was essentially all it came down to. ...X042 page 002.05b (tape 05.2.04b) Matt Notes/Tape 14/06/94This structure is one of the success stories really, it works and it works well, it's kept ??? and it is used. ... you can keep an eye on people and make sure that they do follow the rules as it were. There's..a more powerful language, I mean if I was to write in C++ ... you can get considerably more power. So rather than having to write this sort of code, you just pass it your SQL and it can handle all this, it's all done centrally. ... But Powerbuilder doesn't begin to get you that sort of power and so you are left with having to trust people or keep an eye on people and making sure that they do replicate code.'
Social influence: | Team: Leadership |
Technical influence: | Process: Quality procedures |
![]() |
Recording |
![]() |
![]() |
Story |
![]() |
![]() |
Social influence |
![]() |
![]() |
Technical influence |
![]() |
© Clare Tagg 2000