INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | BOTTOM

Why was the quality of the data poor?: Organisation of data input

The Post Implementation Review reports that initially the underwriters would be responsible for programmes with Services looking at the detailed policies for each country (00610). As the problems of data entry by underwriters (even though they are typically only responsible for 9-20 programmes) continued this spilt of responsibilities was questioned in March '94 (01127) and by August '94 there was agreement that underwriters would only do the programme and master level for new and renewal cases with the rest being done by Services once their resources were sorted out in January '95 (00666).

Social influence:
Organisation: Structure
Technical influence:

Commentary
Social influence
Technical influence

INDEX | ORGANISATION | TIME LINE | PEOPLE | STORY | RESEARCH METHOD | COMMENTARY | FINDINGS | HELP | TOP

© Clare Tagg 2000